SCHMC

Clinical Impact of Intravascular Ultrasound-Guided Chronic Total Occlusion Intervention With Zotarolimus-Eluting Versus Biolimus-Eluting Stent Implantation: Randomized Study

Metadata Downloads
Abstract
BACKGROUND: There have been no randomized studies comparing intravascular ultrasound (IVUS)-guided versus conventional angiography-guided chronic total occlusion (CTO) intervention using new-generation drug-eluting stent Therefore, we conducted a prospective, randomized, multicenter trial designed to test the hypothesis that IVUS-guided CTO intervention is superior to angiography-guided intervention. METHODS AND RESULTS: After successful guidewire crossing, 402 patients with CTOs were randomized to the IVUS-guided group (n=201) or the angiography-guided group (n=201) and secondarily randomized to Resolute zotarolimus-eluting stents or Nobori biolimus-eluting stents. The primary and secondary end points were cardiac death and a major adverse cardiac event defined as the composite of cardiac death, myocardial infarction, or target-vessel revascularization, respectively. After 12-month follow-up, the rate of cardiac death was not significantly different between the IVUS-guided group (0%) and the angiography-guided group (1.0%; P by log-rank test=0.16). However, major adverse cardiac event rates were significantly lower in the IVUS-guided group than that in the angiography-guided group (2.6% versus 7.1%; P=0.035; hazard ratio, 0.35; 95% confidence interval, 0.13-0.97). Occurrence of the composite of cardiac death or myocardial infarction was significantly lower in the IVUS-guided group (0%) than in the angiography-guided group (2.0%; P=0.045). The rates of target-vessel revascularization were not significantly different between the 2 groups. In the comparison between Resolute zotarolimus-eluting stent and Nobori biolimus-eluting stent, major adverse cardiac event rates were not significantly different (4.0% versus 5.7%; P=0.45). CONCLUSIONS: Although IVUS-guided CTO intervention did not significantly reduce cardiac mortality, this randomized study demonstrated that IVUS-guided CTO intervention might improve 12-month major adverse cardiac event rate after new-generation drug-eluting stent implantation when compared with conventional angiography-guided CTO intervention. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT01563952.
All Author(s)
B. K. Kim ; D. H. Shin ; M. K. Hong ; H. S. Park ; S. W. Rha ; G. S. Mintz ; J. S. Kim ; S. J. Lee ; H. Y. Kim ; B. K. Hong ; W. C. Kang ; J. H. Choi ; Y. Jang
Issued Date
2015
Type
Article
Keyword
coronary occlusiondrug-eluting stentsultrasonography, interventional
Publisher
American Heart Association
ISSN
1941-7640
Citation Title
Circulation: Cardiovascular Interventions
Citation Volume
8
Citation Number
7
Citation Start Page
e002592
Citation End Page
e002592
Language(ISO)
eng
DOI
10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.115.002592
URI
http://schca-ir.schmc.ac.kr/handle/2022.oak/1753
Appears in Collections:
심장내과 > 1. Journal Papers
공개 및 라이선스
  • 공개 구분공개
파일 목록
  • 관련 파일이 존재하지 않습니다.

Items in Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.