SCHMC

Transcholecystic management of extrahepatic duct stones in poor candidates for endoscopic or transhepatic approaches

Metadata Downloads
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To investigate transcholecystic management of extrahepatic duct (EHD) stones using balloon ampulloplasty in patients who are poor candidates for endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) and percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage (PTBD) and assess its efficacy and safety. METHODS: Forty-one patients who were unable to undergo ERCP or had failed ERCP with non-dilated intrahepatic ducts (IHD) between February 2019 and October 2020 were retrospectively enrolled. After clinical improvement with percutaneous cholecystostomy (PC), EHD stones were managed through cystic duct passage, guidewire unwinding, sheath insertion, and EHD stone removal using balloon ampulloplasty. If the transcholecystic route failed, a transhepatic approach was used according to the pre-existing cholangiogram obtained via PC. We evaluated the technical success rate and complications of each step. RESULTS: The technical success rate for the transcholecystic-only approach was 80.5%. The remaining cases were successfully managed with transhepatic conversion. Multiple stone removal sessions were required in 22% of the cases. One patient with combined IHD stones was initially converted to a transhepatic approach without any transcholecystic removal trial. The technical success rates for each step were as follows: cystic duct passage (38/40, 95%), guidewire unwinding (36/38, 94.7%), sheath insertion (36/36, 100%), and stone removal using balloon ampulloplasty (33/36, 91.7%). The overall clinical success was 97.6% (40/41) without major procedure-related complications. Thereafter, cholecystectomy was successfully performed in patients with concomitant gallstones (n = 20). No postprocedural complications occurred during the follow-up (1-70days). CONCLUSIONS: Percutaneous EHD stone removal through transcholecystic and transhepatic routes after PC is effective and safe in poor candidates for PTBD or ERCP. KEY POINTS: • This study shows the safety and efficacy of extrahepatic duct (EHD) stones in patients who are poor candidates for initial percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. • The overall technical success for the transcholecystic-only approach was 80.5% (33/41). Including transhepatic conversions, it was 100% (41/41). Stone removal was successful in one session in 78% (32/41) of the patients and in multiple sessions in 28.1% (9/41) of the patients. • Balloon ampulloplasty with stone expulsion using an occlusion balloon catheter is also a safe and effective method for removing EHD stones.
All Author(s)
S. Y. Kim ; S. Lee ; Y. Cho ; S. J. Park ; H. N. Lee
Issued Date
2022
Type
Article
Keyword
Bile Ducts, ExtrahepaticCholedocholithiasisCholecystostomyCholangiographyRadiography, Interventional
Publisher
European Association of Radiology
European Society of Radiology
European Congress of Radiology
ISSN
0938-7994
Citation Title
European Radiology
Citation Volume
32
Citation Number
3
Citation Start Page
1709
Citation End Page
1717
Language(ISO)
eng
DOI
10.1007/s00330-021-08259-0
URI
http://schca-ir.schmc.ac.kr/handle/2022.oak/2648
Appears in Collections:
영상의학과 > 1. Journal Papers
공개 및 라이선스
  • 공개 구분공개
파일 목록
  • 관련 파일이 존재하지 않습니다.

Items in Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.